Let’s run through a couple of Biden’s “Revocation” orders and their implications.įoremost in getting the Biden axe was Trump’s FebruExecutive Order 13,771, “ Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Cost.”Į.O. First, the premise is that government regulation is better for the economy in a downturn than the relaxation of it and the pursuit of resilience and growth and second, that it is OK to resurrect the Obama-era “pen and phone” to make law to advance progressive goals, despite that job properly resting with Congress. That alone is a significant philosophical stance. Biden vowed to revoke what he called Trump’s "harmful policies and directives that threaten to frustrate the Federal Government’s ability to confront these problems.” His order accordingly “empowers agencies to use appropriate regulatory tools to achieve these goals." immigration policy updates in the Migration Information Source, click here.Never mind that federal regulation is already the least disciplined part of what the federal government does, and that remained true under Trump. Read the article here: And to sign up for monthly U.S. “While most attention has focused on these unmet expectations, there can be no doubt that through large and small-bore executive actions alike the administration has advanced or changed policies in ways that have significant impact on humanitarian protection, immigration enforcement and legal immigration, touching the lives of large numbers of immigrants,” Chishti and Bolter conclude. Still, chaotic responses to high levels of migration at the southern border and lack of progress on two key Biden campaign promises-legalization for the country’s unauthorized immigrant population and rebuilding a border asylum system largely dismantled during the prior administration-have fueled public perception that the administration has done little on immigration. The administration also has acted to protect as many as 1 million noncitizens from deportation and give them eligibility to apply for a work permit by expanding Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for nationals from Venezuela and Myanmar who are already in the United States extending TPS designations that Trump sought to terminate for other nationalities but was blocked by the courts from carrying out and by allowing certain victims of crime who are petitioning for a U visa to receive deferred action while awaiting their visa adjudication. entry and to accessing immigration benefits and raising the refugee resettlement ceiling to 125,000. The Biden administration’s actions cover a wide range of issues-greatly narrowing the number of unauthorized immigrants vulnerable to arrest, detention and removal lifting some barriers to U.S. Of Biden’s 296 immigration actions, 89 have reversed or started to undo Trump policies, making clear the administration is doing more than unraveling his predecessor’s policies. Yet as Biden reaches his first anniversary in the White House, a new Migration Policy Institute (MPI) analysis finds that he has outpaced his predecessor in the number of executive actions taken during his first year in office, making significant change in the areas of humanitarian protection, interior and border enforcement and legal immigration.ĭuring his first 364 days as president, Biden took 296 executive actions on immigration-as compared to 86 during Trump's first year and 472 during the entire Trump presidency, analysts Muzaffar Chishti and Jessica Bolter write in a new article for MPI’s online journal, the Migration Information Source. Immigrant-rights activists accuse the president of delay in unraveling hard-line actions taken during Donald Trump’s presidency and conservatives are critical of what they see as inaction to rising flows at the U.S.-Mexico border. WASHINGTON - President Joe Biden’s administration is being criticized across the political spectrum for moving too slowly on immigration.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |